Select a Category:
HOME | MOVIE REVIEWS
| 4 STAR REVIEWS |
TRAILERS
ABOUT US | CONTACT US
| LINKS | PUBLISHING PERMISSION


Join Our Newsletter
 

Search Our Site
 

Showtimes
 
(e.g. Santa Barbara, CA or 93101)

DVD & VHS Search
 


Our 4 Star Rating:
 
1 Star: Destructive values
Films which present a dehumanizing perspective.

2 Star: Shallow
Films that provide basic entertainment, but no message of any substantive meaning.

3 Star: Thought-provoking
Films that engage the viewer in ideology, experiences, beliefs, with which we may or may not agree but they cause us to think and be better informed.

4 Star: Uplifting
Films that inspire the viewer to become emotionally and spiritually renewed or transformed by the messages portrayed.

10,000 BC

2 Stars – Shallow

According to the trailers for Roland Emmerich’s film “10,000 BC,” this is; “a prehistoric epic that follows a young mammoth hunter's journey through uncharted territory to secure the future of his tribe.”  More accurately, it is a cheesy Saturday matinee cartoon-like extravaganza with lots of computer-generated animals in less-than-believable fight scenes.

Forget about facts here.  Prehistoric mammoths roam the earth with modern tribesmen while building ancient pyramids.  Those three occurrences alone span very different periods of history, but that doesn’t seem to matter in this film.  When you include a main character named “D’Leh” (Steven Strait) who has perfect teeth and looks like a fashion model (Strait actually worked as a model for Vogue), then the cartoon nature of this film is complete.

If there is any redeeming feature to “10,000 BC,” it is in the fact that families – as tribes – are considered of value.  D’Leh is willing to lead the fight against evil people and animals in order to preserve his most significant relationships.  Once again, you have to suspend disbelief to allow yourself to think that modern romantic relationships existed with nomadic tribes 10,000 years ago.

There is little in this story to give insight as to how mankind evolved in its journey towards spiritual enlightenment or values development.  Instead, we are witness to a hodgepodge of images of ancient rituals and symbols that emerged 5,000 years after this story supposedly took place.

The role of women and children in an ancient tribal society would have been interesting to note, but the writer and director chose instead to play this out as if this were a group of 1960’s hippies looking for enlightenment in a foreboding landscape.  The roles that women play in the film are more suited to an 1890’s melodrama.

Good stories about how mankind evolved in its thinking and practices could be both entertaining and thoughtfully engaging.  Unfortunately, “10,000 BC” has more in common with films such as “Barbarella” than it does with the “Ten Commandments.”

 

DISCUSSION:

  1. If you were able to go back to 10,000 years Before Christ, what do you think you would see?  How would you have told this tale?

 

  1. When telling a story of prehistoric times, how accurate do you think it should be?  Is a cartoon-telling appropriate?

 

  1. According to the Bible, the development of religious thought required God’s intervention.  Do you believe God intervened in history or not?  Why do you answer as you do?

 

________________       

Cinema In Focus is a social and spiritual movie commentary.  Hal Conklin is former mayor of Santa Barbara and Denny Wayman is pastor of the Free Methodist Church. For more reviews: http://www.cinemainfocus.com.

 


Select a Category:
HOME | MOVIE REVIEWS
| 4 STAR REVIEWS |
TRAILERS
ABOUT US | CONTACT US
| LINKS | PUBLISHING PERMISSION

© 2000-2007 Cinema In Focus