![]() |
|
|
| Select
a Category: HOME | MOVIE REVIEWS | 4 STAR REVIEWS | TRAILERS ABOUT US | CONTACT US | LINKS | PUBLISHING PERMISSION |
|
|
|
OCEAN’S THIRTEEN 2 Stars - Shallow As trilogies go, Steven Soderbergh’s third film is strong.
Having
created
a
merry
band
of
thieves
in
“Ocean’s
11,”
and
having
disappointed
their
fans
in
“Ocean’s
12,”
“Ocean’s
Thirteen”
restores
our
interest.
Not
only
is
the
caper
they
are
pulling
complex
but
we
find
their
motivation
to
be
one
of
loyalty
rather
than
greed,
with
the
usual
touch
of
vengeance. As is true in many films with thieving antiheroes, the plot
goes
out
of
its
way
to
help
us
understand
that
they
only
steal
from
the
bad
guys
who
deserve
it.
In
this
film,
they
take
it
to
the
next
level
as
the
film
ends
with
a
scene
in
which
the
innocent
hotel
evaluator
who
is
a
collateral
victim
of
their
scheme
is
overwhelmingly
rewarded
for
his
pain
so
as
to
reinforce
their
good-guy
status. The ensemble cast continues to work well as the writers keep
the
characters
simple
and
not
caricatured.
Danny
Ocean
(George
Clooney)
and
Rusty
Ryan
(Brad
Pitt)
continue
to
be
the
suave
leaders
of
the
group.
Linus
Caldwell
(Matt
Damon)
retains
the
comedic
role
of
being
the
young
“wanna-be”
thief
trying
to
win
his
father’s
and
friend’s
admiration.
Basher
Tarr
(Don
Cheadle)
is
a
poetic
major
equipment
operator
who
can
single-handedly
operate
the
drill
that
dug
the
Chunnel.
And
Frank
Catton
(Bernie
Mac),
and
Saul
Bloom
(Carl
Reiner)
and
the
others
are
likeable,
believable
members
of
this
infamous
group. The plot revolves around the attempt by Reuben Tishkoff (Elliott
Gould)
to
go
straight
and
invest
his
plunder
in
a
legitimate
casino. The problem is that he chose as his business
partner
a
notoriously
unscrupulous
developer
named
Willie
Bank
(Al
Pacino).
Bank
predictably
forces
Reuben
out
of
his
share
of
the
casino
and
Reuben
has
a
heart
attack. But the doctor explains to his gathered band
that
if
Reuben
only
had
something
to
live
for,
then
he
might
recover
from
his
cardiac
infarction.
Ocean’s
team
of
thirteen
decides
that
getting
revenge
against
Bank
would
be
just
the
medicine
needed
for
Reuben’s
recovery. The plot is complex and doesn’t have some of the magic of “Ocean’s
Eleven,”
but
it
is
far
more
interesting
than
the
second
film. The patented line that what they are going
to
try
“is
impossible”
still
works
as
it
comes
with
Danny
Ocean’s
sly
grin
and
the
technical,
acrobatic,
electrical
and
psychological
manipulations
weave
together
well. There is a subplot of a Mexican factory where dice are made
that
seems
out
of
place
until
even
that
event
is
woven
into
the
main
story
and
we
realize
that
the
band
improves
the
working
conditions
for
the
brother
of
one
of
the
inside
men
who
helped
them
scam
the
casino. Though the merry band of thieves who only rob from the rich
and
help
the
poor
is
an
archetypal
tale,
this
third
installment
of
Soderbergh’s
is
an
enjoyable
telling
with
its
usual
amazing
solutions
and
unexpected
twists.
Entertaining
as
it
may
be
to
watch
the
puzzle
pieces
come
together,
this
film
continues
its
illegal
approach
to
life
devoid
of
spiritual
and
moral
values
of
faith
in
God,
truthful
interactions
and
honest
character. Only love for their friend stands as a social
and
spiritual
value.
However
this
group’s
actions
of
love
for
their
friend
destroy
others’
jobs,
well-being,
peace
and
relationships.
For
love
to
be
pure,
it
can’t
include
destruction
of
another.
Discussion:
1.
When we make heroes of thieves as we do
with
Robin
Hood
of
old
and
Danny
Ocean
of
today,
what
do
you
believe
this
does
to
our
sense
of
right
and
wrong?
Does
it
reinforce
our
morals
or
weaken
them?
2.
Did
you
miss
the
presence
of
a
love-interest
for
Danny
Ocean
in
this
third
film?
Why
or
why
not?
3.
The
loyalty
demonstrated
by
the
group
to
Reuben
by
wreaking
revenge
on
the
man
who
broke
him
and
thought
he
should
“roll
over
and
die”
reveals
an
“honor
among
thieves.”
Within
the
film,
this
was
described
as
binding
for
those
who
“shook
Sinatra’s
hand.” What would be similar in your own life that
binds
you
to
a
code
of
behavior?
4.
Do
you
believe
that
for
love
to
be
pure,
it
can’t
destroy
another? Why or why not?
________________ Cinema In Focus is a social and spiritual movie commentary.
Hal
Conklin
is
former
mayor
of
Santa
Barbara
and
Denny
Wayman
is
pastor
of
the
Free
Methodist
Church.
For
more
reviews:
http://www.cinemainfocus.com.
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
| Select
a Category: HOME | MOVIE REVIEWS | 4 STAR REVIEWS | TRAILERS ABOUT US | CONTACT US | LINKS | PUBLISHING PERMISSION |
|
|
© 2000-2007 Cinema In Focus