![]() |
|
|
| Select
a Category: HOME | MOVIE REVIEWS | 4 STAR REVIEWS | TRAILERS ABOUT US | CONTACT US | LINKS | PUBLISHING PERMISSION |
|
|
|
Pirates of the Caribbean: At World’s End 2 Stars – Disturbing 2007 is the summer of the trilogies. From “SpiderMan 3” to “Shrek the Third” and
now
“Pirates
of
the
Caribbean:
at
World’s
End,”
the
theatres
have
hooked
us
into
the
continuing
tales
of
familiar
characters. This is both a joy and a disappointment. The joy comes from our desire to see the continuing
adventures
of
characters
we’ve
come
to
love,
but
the
magic
of
the
first
films
is
seldom
matched
by
their
sequels,
and
it
is
easy
for
our
artists
to
perform
caricatures
of
their
original
creations.
This
is
true
of
Captain
Jack
Sparrow
(Johnny
Depp)
in
this
third
film
of
Pirates
of
the
Caribbean.
Where
his
eccentric
mannerisms
and
serendipitous
genius
caught
us
delightfully
off-guard
in
the
first
film,
he
must
now
become
multiple
clones
of
himself
in
order
to
try
unsuccessfully
to
achieve
the
same
effect.
And
his
former
genius
is
not
only
expected
but
also
makes
his
present
capers
hard
to
exceed
his
previous
schemes. The story left us at the end of the second film with a deceased
Capt.
Jack
Sparrow.
Having
been
sacrificed
to
the
leviathan
creature
Kraken
by
the
beautiful
Elizabeth
Swann
(Keira
Knightly)
whose
kiss
sealed
his
fate,
her
guilt
has
now
driven
her
to
attempt
his
rescue
from
a
place
of
limbo
beyond
death
but
not
yet
dead. This is the major theme of this increasingly dark trilogy of
films.
The
films
rests
on
archetypal
fears
and
beliefs.
These
are
seen
in
the
quasi-eternal
Davey
Jones
(Bill
Nighly)
who
is
to
care
for
those
who
die
at
sea
but
instead
offers
a
purgatorial
service
on
his
ghostly
ship,
the
mythical
goddess
Calypso
(Naomi
Harris)
who
has
become
imprisoned
in
physical
form
by
the
pirate
lords,
and
the
incantations
of
dark
magic
which
can
bring
a
person
back
from
the
dead. Central to both the second and third films
is
the
symbolic
and
literal
encasement
of
a
heart
in
a
chest,
locked
away
from
pain
and
danger.
In
this
third
film,
we
see
that
if
we
kill
that
heart,
then
we
will
have
to
give
our
own
heart
in
return. Different from the Christian concept of a sinless heart given
so
our
sinful,
broken
hearts
can
be
eternally
healed,
in
this
tale
the
evil
heart
can
be
replaced
by
anyone’s
heart,
whatever
the
motive
to
do
so. This expresses a more mechanistic belief of
a
heart
for
a
heart,
like
that
of
black
magic
religions. One of the discoveries of Capt. Sparrow in this third film
is
that
“down
is
up.”
This
specific
statement
understood
as
a
solution
to
their
particular
predicament
explains
the
world
of
the
pirate
tale
in
general.
The
looting,
betraying,
scheming,
self-advancing,
mutinous,
murderous
world
of
the
pirate
is
“UP”
in
these
films,
when
in
reality
such
behavior
creates
a
chaos
and
a
destruction
that
even
the
“Pirate’s
Code”
cannot
stop.
It
is
this
inverted
morality
that
makes
these
films
both
intriguing
and
injurious.
Discussion:
1.
The explanations that Tia Dalma (Naomie
Harris)
gives
about
why
it
is
possible
to
bring
back
Capt.
Sparrow
but
not
Elizabeth’s
father
is
that
Jack
and
his
ship,
the
Black
Pearl,
were
swallowed
whole
-
soul
and
all
-
by
Kraken,
but
Governor
Swann’s
(Jonathan
Pryce)
soul
was
separated
from
his
body
at
death.
In
what
way
do
you
believe
our
souls
and
our
bodies
are
whole? Do you think it is possible to go somewhere
with
both
our
bodies
and
our
souls
and
be
able
to
return
to
this
life?
2.
The
obvious
need
for
a
Pirate’s
Code
to
keep
“honor
among
thieves”
is
seen
in
this
film.
How
do
you
believe
moral
written
laws
work
or
do
not
work
to
keep
pirate-like
people
from
hurting
one
another?
What
do
you
think
is
more
effective?
3.
What
is
it
in
all
of
us
that
causes
us
to
be
intrigued
with
pirates,
who
we
should
be
repulsed
by
if
they
rape,
pillage
and
kill
us
and
the
people
we
love? Are these really our suppressed desires, or
shadowed
motives
that
we
wish
we
could
express,
or
is
there
some
other
force
at
work
that
makes
pirates
so
engaging?
________________ Cinema In Focus is a social and spiritual movie commentary.
Hal
Conklin
is
former
mayor
of
Santa
Barbara
and
Denny
Wayman
is
pastor
of
the
Free
Methodist
Church.
For
more
reviews:
http://www.cinemainfocus.com.
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
| Select
a Category: HOME | MOVIE REVIEWS | 4 STAR REVIEWS | TRAILERS ABOUT US | CONTACT US | LINKS | PUBLISHING PERMISSION |
|
|
© 2000-2007 Cinema In Focus